Why Every Musician Should Watch “Love & Mercy”

This film succeeds as both psychological dramatization and love letter to a vindicated artist and his path to channeling musical greatness.

Advertisements

By Richie Angel

“I can’t write about the summer and fun and summer and summer and fun and cars! I got different stuff inside me! I gotta get it out!”

Advertisement.

Originally conceived in 1988 and slated to star William Hurt and Richard Dreyfuss, Love & Mercy was eventually revived as a passion project for Bill Pohlad, producer of Tree of Life and 12 Years a Slave. Pohlad financed and helmed the filmโ€”only his second directorial feature, twenty-four years after his debutโ€”taking special care to cover his subject, Beach Boys legend Brian Wilson, with the utmost historical accuracy. Referring to one major portion of this gripping biopic, Wilson called it โ€œvery factual, accurate, stimulating.โ€

Love & Mercy follows Wilson in two timelines, twenty years apart. In the first, Wilson (Paul Dano) sets out to surpass The Beatlesโ€™ Rubber Soul, composing the unconventional Pet Sounds while confronting mental illness and pushback over his deviations from The Beach Boysโ€™ formula. In the second, Melinda Ledbetter (Elizabeth Banks) falls for a heavily medicated Wilson (John Cusack), but she starts picking up bad vibrations from Wilsonโ€™s psychotherapist (Paul Giamatti).

John Cusack and Elizabeth Banks in Love & Mercy.

Pohlad compared Love & Mercy to A Beautiful Mind, with music instead of math. Screenwriter Oren Moverman said he was โ€œnot just trying to tell a story,โ€ but โ€œcreate a cinematic equivalent” of Wilson’s music, with โ€œstrange chord shifts in the cinematic structure.โ€

Advertisement.

Somehow, the film succeeds. Every time you think itโ€™s just an innovative, occasionally tragic biopic, the movie assaults you with elements of a psychological thriller. Early on, the film includes sixty seconds of darkness, populated by swirling audio cuesโ€”snatches of memories, or maybe inspiration that Wilson is trying to harness. The unsettling sound design lingers throughout, with an atmospheric audio mix that emphasizes the background with plane engines, party music, birdsong, and clanking silverware. Many sets feature white-walled rooms, reminiscent of institutionalization. The movie is captured through Wilsonโ€™s mind. And yet, while the second timeline is presented in Ledbetterโ€™s perspective, the sound and set cues continue when Wilson is absent. Again, somehow, it succeeds.

Brian Wilson (center) on the set of Love & Mercy.
Advertisements

The first timeline is awe-inspiring, watching Wilson navigate the off-the-wall production of what is now one of the most acclaimed albums of all time, shot in the very studio where it took place. While bandmates question (at best) the โ€œcar horns and bicycle bells and jingle jangle,โ€ or โ€œtwo bass lines in two different keys,โ€ Wilson reassures, โ€œWell, it works in my head,โ€ putting bobby pins on piano strings, recording dogs barking, and asking, โ€œChuck, do you think you could get a horse in here?โ€ The sessions feature dozens of unique instruments including kettle drums, a fish gรผiro, and a clown horn. At one point, Wilson spends hours adjusting a cello. Wilson is out to โ€œmake the greatest album ever made,โ€ and the secret lives somewhere between dedication and obsession.

Love & Mercy bucks stale and parodied formulas, succeeding as both psychological dramatization and love letter to a vindicated artist and his path to channeling musical greatness. And thatโ€™s why every musician should watch Love & Mercy.

Advertisements

Discover more from Provo Music Magazine

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading